Tuesday
Jun252013

The Zeitgeist

 

The New Shiddach Crisis: Over-40 Orthodox Singles

 

Note: An abridged version of this story appeared in The 5 Towns Jewish Times on June 21st, This is the unedited version. This article also contains many Hebrew words.

Much has been made of the alleged “shiddach crisis” in the Orthodox community where girls of 22 and 23 feel as though they’re consigned to eternal spinsterhood if they’ve not gotten married by that point. Not to denigrate the very real anxiety of these young ladies and their parents but at 22 a person has no end of personal possibilities and opportunities. At 42 or 50, not so much.

While some may bemoan that every single young man and woman in their early 20s is not married by their 21st birthday, nevertheless there are no end of weddings filling up the calendar on any given Thursday or Sunday night and on many other afternoons and evenings as well. Go to any large quality kosher restaurant on almost any night and you’re sure to find a sheva brachot meal in progress. In shul, a barrage of aufrufs hog the bima and bring elaborate hot kiddushim to the masses. Fifty year-old grandmothers are quite ubiquitous in most Orthodox neighborhoods. There’s a whole lot of marriage activity going on, even if not every last living soul finds their bashert by 22.

Contrasting the blizzard of twenty-something weddings is the near total dearth of nuptials for anyone Orthodox who is over 40. When was the last time you were at a wedding of some forty-somethings? I thought so. There is a palpable personal and communal mania to get married in one’s early 20s which is contrasted by the equally palpable apathy about doing the same when one is over 40. Combine this with the relatively recent divorce boom in the Modern and centrist Orthodox communities and you have the makings of a midlife shiddach crisis.

The over-40 frum single population is not nearly as homogeneous as those in their early 20s. There are two main subgroups, the first being the never-marrieds and the second being the divorced. The never-marrieds comprise several subdivisions of their own. You have those who concentrated on their education and careers to the near exclusion of all else and/or concentrated on having a lot of fun dating a lot of people a lot of the time with not one serious thought in mind. This is an imitation of the secular and general population’s mores.

Included in this group is the closeted Orthodox gay population. Yes, if gay people exist in noticeable numbers across every population group in America they exist in the Orthodox community as well. Because of close family ties and 12-plus years of Jewish education (along with a genuine affinity for many aspects of Orthodox life) there is a segment of the over-40 single population that is just passing for heterosexual and always uses the excuse that they’ve just not met the right person yet. It is socio-culturally and halachically impossible for someone to declare themselves both Orthodox and gay, so they either stifle it or live in shadows and closets which has to be an almost unbearable burden. As a community we deny the existence of a gay population, but it’s there.

Also in the never-marrieds are those who are phobic to a point of paralysis – be it fear of commitment, emotional intimacy, physical intimacy, “settling,” or any combination of the above. There are some who did manage to get engaged once or twice but pre-marital jitters or last-minute revelations scotched the wedding, sometimes at the eleventh hour and they’re scarred or damaged from this in some fashion. There are also some never-marrieds who are confirmed bachelors and bachelorettes who actually revel in the superficially fun lifestyle of dating someone new all the time. These people will also tell you they’re still looking for “the one,” because it’s just socially unacceptable in the Orthodox world to say you don’t want to get married, but they really don’t.

Lastly, some never-marrieds are just a little bit odd or off – a condition that is often exacerbated over many years residing in microscopic Manhattan studio apartments talking to the walls and their cats. A lot of the over-40’s have given-up on internet dating and going to singles events out of a sense of futility and ennui. Many have resigned themselves to their lifestyle and created communities of likeminded Orthodox singles (particularly on the Upper West Side) to share shabbatot and yom tovim together where there is zero (often parental) pressure to get married. Shabbat and three-day yontiffs require peer support because Orthodoxy is essentially a group or family activity. Because of that, on the flip side of the coin are singles who go off the derech. Due to the rigors of observant life and what can be the oppressive solitude of being alone, some people lose their kavanah and slowly, incrementally join the secular population as a means towards assuaging the deadening effect of shabbatot and holidays alone or spent with families that can inadvertently make them feel worse about their single status.

Study after study has shown that never-married women over 40 have the same odds of getting married as being struck by lightning (which is why parents are correct in pushing their young daughters to marry early) and even if they do manage to get hitched, having a child or two is fraught with huge expense (for medical intervention) and anxiety. Manhattan has a large population of Orthodox women who will never have children. To remedy this, some Modern Orthodox women of a certain age have opted to go the route of artificial insemination and be single moms. There are about 12-25 of these women annually. Having a child with a “ghost father” does nothing to enhance a single woman’s marketability vis-à-vis marriage as many guys find the whole process off-putting.

For men, 50 is the new 40. If a man is financially successful and perhaps reasonably attractive he can get married for the first time in his 40s but if by 50 he hasn’t tied the knot, women under 40 generally won’t consider him and he probably has a reputation of being commitment phobic, which earns him the sobriquet of “toxic bachelor.”

The Divorced

The escalating divorce rate in the Orthodox community apes the behavior of American society as a whole where there is a perception that quick and simple solutions exist to complex problems. There’s nothing simple about divorce (especially with children) and it usually results in the swapping of one set of problems for another. Sometimes people are so frantic to change their lives that they’ve no real idea of how difficult it may be to ever get remarried.

The divorced population also has sub-categories. People who divorced young, under 30 and with no kids or with one or two have a high probability of getting remarried if they’re marriage-minded. For women over 35 it is trickier especially as the more children a divorced woman has goes right to the heart of her eligibility and chances for remarriage but you still see a bunch of second marriages in one’s 30s. When the big four-oh hits, everything changes and marriages practically stop cold.

A lot of over-40 frum female divorcees quite frankly have had it with marriage. They may have gotten married in their early or mid 20s and had a number of kids with their ex and they’re burnt out and exhausted from the experience. Often, their former husbands did unpleasant things either during the marriage or the divorce (or both) and so a lot of these ladies really don’t want another man padding around the house scratching himself, watching sports on TV and making all the male bodily noises that they now find repugnant after a decade or two of living with their often now-hated ex. They would make an exception for a hedge fund guy bringing in seven figures a year and who looks like Brad Pitt, but these fellows are few and far between.

Many of these girls just want to have fun, so they will have liaisons with men from outside the community (so their modesty is preserved within it) and run out to parties and clubs. A lot of these ladies look at themselves in the mirror and (in a state of delusion) see a 23 year-old in their reflection and so sometimes behave accordingly even though they may be the mother of several children. These women are not interested in or able to have any more children so they don’t see the need to be married, especially to balding, aging guys evincing various degrees of emerging corpulence and lacking wads of flash cash with which to enable Prada shopping sprees or fancy vacations.

In the over-40 Modern Orthodox divorced population, marriage has come to be seen by both sexes as something exclusively for procreation. If no procreating, no need to tie the knot. Companionship and intimacy are increasingly seen as commodities that can be leased, not purchased.

Among the divorced men, a lot of them had a harrowing divorce experience themselves where they lost their families (or any least their family life), daily access to their kids and their homes (as in their physical residences, often necessitating an involuntary downsizing in accommodation). The divorce itself probably cost a small fortune and the men still have to pay yeshiva tuition, camp tuition, child support and sometimes even the mortgages on their former homes. They might have three or four kids and are crushed by the burden of supporting two households even if they earn $200,000 a year. The last thing a lot of these guys want to do is take on a whole new raft of financial responsibilities (i.e., a woman and their several kids or have more kids with a new woman) when they can barely make ends meet as it is. For them “The Brady Bunch” blended family is a fantasy TV show from the 70s. These guys feel they did their duty to Klal Yisrael (and their parents) by having several kids and now they, too, want to have some fun.

Numerous studies of the general population conclusively show that women initiate nearly two-thirds of all divorces over 30. It’s a myth that mostly men are breaking up their homes. Having been on the receiving end of the devastating emotional and financial experience of divorce, the guys are often also disgusted with the institution of marriage and understandably gun shy as well. Also, the last thing they’re looking for is a replica of their now ex-wife in the form of a 40-something divorced woman with several kids in tow. If they have no interest in more children they also see no need to get married. Freed of the marriage chiuv (in their minds) they proceed to have flings far and wide (again, often outside the confines of the community) and look to enjoy themselves.

The toughest time of the week for the over-40 divorced is typically Shabbat because the nuclear Shabbat family table has been broken apart. It is typically during those 25 hours and on holidays that one’s divorced status is made most acutely aware and it can be tough, especially in the suburbs if one lacks extended family or many good friends in close proximity. It can be harder if one’s kids have left the nest.

A Solution?

Generally the rabbis and organized Orthodoxy are as apathetic towards the over-40 singles as are most of the singles themselves towards the imperative of being married. The sense among communal leaders is “you had your chance when you were young and we have to focus on the next generation” and “you’re grown ups, fend for yourselves.” So fend they do. There are several promoters who organize parties for the over-40 Modern observant crowd. Some of these events can draw upwards of 500 people or more. The general theme of these events is “party like its 1999,” in that nearly all of these parties are frantic near-deafening dance music fests of the kind they used to attend when they were 25. Now that they’re 45 and burned and burnt from divorce or happy being never-married they want to imagine themselves as their former 25 year-old selves if only for a few hours.

The problem with these kinds of events is that it’s nearly impossible to talk to anyone new let alone even hear oneself think. So people go and drink and scope one another out, pretend to have a good time and only very rarely make a meaningful connection with someone from the opposite sex, but the partiers party on in a cacophony of quiet desperation.

The world of Modern and centrist Orthodox over-40 singles is the very definition of a demimonde – a micro-world. The right-wing, yeshivish and haredi people consider us to be near apikorsim especially because Moderns dress like regular Americans and even watch TV and movies and don’t spend nearly enough time studying and in shul in their estimation. The Moderns and centrists often see those on the right as being either socio-culturally uncool and/or stiflingly religious. The shadchans of the world tend towards the more right wing and towards the young, so the over-40 Moderns don’t get a lot of shiddach action. In defense of many shadchans, they see that many Moderns are not marriage-minded, so it’s a waste of time for them.

There used to be a time 30 and 40-plus years ago when places like Grossinger’s and The Concord would attract Jews from all walks of life and Modern Orthodox singles in particular would meet their counterparts from traditional or less-observant homes. This greatly expanded the dating pool. Those days are long gone. Most Conservative, Reform and unaffiliated (secular) Jewish singles today of whatever age generally are loathe to date or even consider marriage to any kind of Orthodox person, no matter how culturally American they may be. They see us as “Amish,” envisioning Shabbat as a Satmar-like experience that creeps them out. They have more in common with secular Christians than with Modern Orthodox Jews, which is why the non-Orthodox intermarriage rate is stratospheric. They’d rather deal with Christmas and Easter than Shabbat, kashrut and the holidays. But that’s another story. What it means in practicality is that the over-40 Orthodox single has a very small pond to swim and fish in and the water is evaporating with each and every passing year.

I don’t know what the overall prescription is for this dilemma other than that a paradigm shift needs to take place, aided by the community, to say that to be Orthodox means to be married and that marriage is not just for making babies (which is vital) but also to give you the fulfillment that comes with a richer life made possible by companionship and that life ought not to be lived alone or in random hookups of dubious emotional satisfaction. Until Modern and centrist Orthodox over-40 singles shed the secularist notions of marriage just for procreation, the ranks of the legion of the lonely will only continue to swell.

Thursday
Jun202013

The Zeitgeist

 

James Gandolfini: As Important as Brando in the Fermament of Fictional Mafia Bosses

Note: This appeared originally on June 20, 2013 in The Huffington Post.

We now know how The Sopranos really ends -- Tony is taken out by the celestial capo di tutti capi. The series finale was left ambiguous but the boss of bosses up above doesn't go for unresolved endings, so ascending to heaven is New Jersey native James Gandolfini, who at 51 definitely went way before his time.

Gandolfini generally played heavies in film and television not because he was a big guy but because he was a heavyweight actor. The hugeness of his screen presence was most significantly manifested in his eight-year portrayal of Jersey mob boss Tony Soprano. The Sopranos created a new paradigm for dramatic television and made HBO must-see TV. Gandolfini's work was recognized by his peers by repeatedly winning the prime-time Emmy award for Best Actor in a Dramatic Series along with similar honors from the Screen Actors Guild. He also took home awards from the Golden Globes and the American Film Institute, and was nominated just about every year that he didn't win.

The Sopranos, and Gandolfini's role as Tony, was every bit as important to the oeuvre of American mafia celluloid fiction as were Marlon Brando's Don Corleone and Al Pacino as Michael in The Godfather. Aside from that Coppola epic, The Sopranos probably had the most impact on American popular culture as it relates to Italian-American gangsters. Gandolfini was brilliant as Tony Soprano precisely because he seemed to embody and then channel his New Jersey Italian ethnicity thoroughly and completely.

Millions would tune in on Sundays at 9:00 p.m. to learn sage advice on how to run a complex business organization, how to manage recalcitrant personnel, how to fend-off federal regulators (in the form of law enforcement) and how to deal with high levels of stress. It was the quintessential primer on executive management tips for the new millennium. On the home front, Tony faced all the same frustrations and temptations as most middle-aged, upper-middle class men with the caveat that he acted upon the deeply repressed impulses of so many guys living lives of quiet desperation and in so doing served as a vicarious release for male frustration and aggression no less important than that offered by professional football earlier on any given Sunday. That Tony got away with most of it was part of the allure of his character. Gandolfini brought infinite layers of complexity and nuance to a role that is most often either played overly simplistically or for laughs.

Gandolfini's untimely departure is like that of John Lennon or Jim Morrison. There would never be a Beatles reunion after December 1980 or any real performances by The Doors after July 1971 and so The Sopranos can never rise again without the anchoring presence of the Sopranos' paterfamilias.

For those of us born between 1957 and 1963, Gandolfini's tragic early death is a loud knock on our late-40s and early-50-something doors. It is a signal that our lives, no matter how accomplished, are not infinite and our youth fleeting. To Gandolfini's family, friends and colleagues, a big-hearted guy will now leave a gaping hole by his disappearance.

Even in reruns, The Sopranos is one of the best shows on TV. It always seems fresh and vibrant even if you've seen that particular episode a half dozen times. That's partly a testament to James Gandofini who gave a performance for the ages on a par with Brando. Thanks, Mr. Gandofini, for making many a Sunday night so meaningful. We wish you Godspeed and a great seat in heaven's Bada-Bing.

Friday
May242013

The Zeiteist

 

With Yankees Impending Invasion of CitiField,

Why is Mr. Met Smiling?

Dismal Days for Mets Fans

Over the course of many years, Esquire magazine ran recurring cover photos of the late former President Richard M. Nixon with the headlined question, “why is this man smiling?” The New York Mets baseball team has the distinction of having put the first mascot ever in major league history on their field, in the person of Mr. Met. Mr. Met has a huge head in the shape of a baseball and Mr. Met is always, perpetually, permanently, smiling. 

Just as with Esquire’s query about Nixon, it begs the same question not only of Mr. Met specifically but of Mets management generally – because going into a seven game series this weekend against the surging 28-18 first place in their division Atlanta Braves (at home) followed by a four-gamer against the first place in the AL-East and cross town rival New York Yankees (also 28-18), there’s not a whole lot for Met fans to be smiling about.

The Mets are at 17 and 27 – which  believe it or not is not the worst record in the National League (that honor goes to the Miami Marlins) but it’s 10.5 games behind the Braves and the flipside of the Yankees’ record in just about every respect – and that includes self respect. It’s hard for Met fans to have self-respect when this weekend’s series was preceded by a three game sweep by the visiting Cincinnati Reds (29-18) who know how to pitch, catch and hit the ball.

In the last two seasons, as hobbled as the Mets were, they at least gave fans some excitement for the first half of the season. In 2011 they hovered around .500. Last year they were several games over .500 for most of the first half before their inevitable collapse. This season the Mets collapsed after the first month. Fans were highly upset that management dealt away Cy Young Award-winning pitcher and fan favorite R.A.Dickey. The year prior they dumped Jose Reyes. Signing David Wright to a long term contract is just not enough. Having one great pitcher in Matt Harvey is also not enough when in a five-man starting rotation four guys can’t be banked on and when you have a bullpen that routinely has the worst ERA in the majors and can be counted on to routinely blow games when the Mets have leads going into the seventh and eighth innings.

Monday through Thursday is baseball “color war” week in New York. The games are also known as the ‘Subway Series.” The Mets face the Yanks for two games at home on Monday and Tuesday and then travel to The Bronx to play the Bombers on their home turf. Unfortunately for Mets fans, their record against the Yanks is a dismal 36-54 with a lot of the pain coming in the last few years. In 2012 the Mets went 1-5.  In 2011, 2-4.  In 2009 also 1-5.  And let’s not forget that 1-4 World Series in 2000. (http://ultimatemets.com/oppteams.php?ThisTeam=19)

Given the depressed state of Mets fans, it is highly likely that the majority of fans in the stands at CitiField will be pro-Yankee. Met fans have been selling their Subway Series tickets in droves online and hordes of Yankee fans have been snapping them up at a discount to revel in the anticipated clobbering and potential humiliation of a Mets team that can barely be called major league.

In a two-team town like New York, playing like Miami, Milwaukee (18-27) or Houston (14-33) is just unacceptable. New Yorkers define themselves (well, a lot of male New Yorkers anyway) by their team allegiances. You’re either a Jet or a Giant, a Net or a Knick, an Islander or a Ranger, a Met or a Yankee. Fans need to know their team are contenders not perennial losers. Met fans have gotten to a point where they’d be thrilled just to have a .500 season, let alone a post season. Yet management allows the Mets to get worse and worse and to fans it appears they don’t seem to care.

A case in point is that of first baseman Ike Davis. In 42 games and 143 at-bats going into Friday, Davis is hitting at .147. There are pitchers with higher batting averages. In fact, Mets ace Matt Harvey is batting .150. Last season Davis couldn’t hit a whiffle ball for the first half before bouncing back just when the team didn’t need his bat in the second half. This year he’s batting even worse if that’s possible. His defensive fielding has been challenged as well. Yet management sticks with him most days in the starting lineup. Why is a guy with a .147 average starting most days in the majors? This is a metaphor for Mets management apparent apathy towards the 2013 season and their fans.

So for the Met faithful, the Subway Series game to be at will be Tuesday when Matt Harvey and his 1.93 ERA and 5-0 record will be on the mound to give the Mets a fighting chance. But for the seven games coming, look for the Mets to only take two of them and look for the rest of the season to careen downhill further from there into misery and irrelevance.